Supreme Court hearing on Z + security for Mukesh Ambani and family, find out what was the verdict? - Newztezz - Latest News Today, Breaking News, Top News Headlines, Latest Sports News

Breaking

Monday, November 2, 2020

Supreme Court hearing on Z + security for Mukesh Ambani and family, find out what was the verdict?


New Delhi:
 Mukesh Ambani is the richest man not only in India but also in Asia .He owns Reliance Industries, India's largest company by value. His home in Antilia, Mumbai, is one of the most expensive in the world. He and his family currently have z + protection. He was taken to PIL in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court rejected the PIL, seeking revocation of Z + protection granted to Mukesh Ambani and his family. The court made it clear that the matter belonged to the government. It is up to the government to decide, based on the likelihood of danger..

PIL was filed in December 2019.
Himanshu Agarwal had filed a PIL in the Supreme Court in December 2019 against the judgment of the Mumbai High Court in this regard. Justice Ashok Bhushan dismissed the appeal. The matter, he said, belongs to the states as a whole.

The Mumbai High
Court has ruled that those who are at risk can seek Z + protection at their own expense and the state government is bound to provide it. At the time, the court was told that the Ambani family was ready to bear the full cost of the security. After that, the Mumbai Police Commissioner has no choice but to provide security.

In the Manmohan Singh government, Ambani got security
It may be mentioned that in 2013, the issue of giving Z-plus security to Mukesh Ambani came up a lot. The apex court then asked the then Manmohan Singh government to respond to the provision of Z-plus security to the country's most powerful person. The court asked the government why Ambani was finally given Z-Plus security. The apex court said on the government's decision on the security of Reliance Industries owner Mukesh Ambani, why such people are being given security when the common man is feeling insecure.

No comments:

Post a Comment